<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=MailContainerBody
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; PADDING-TOP: 15px; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; TEXT-DECORATION: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none"
leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 acc_role="text" CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area"><?xml:namespace prefix="v" /><?xml:namespace prefix="o" />
<DIV>I often find that many of the deletionists endorse and use this "policy":
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If an article is not up-to-date, NPOV, well-written, long enough, or
sufficiently accurate; then, it should be deleted. It is up to those who vote
"keep"; to render this article to a "proper" level of quality; otherwise, it
will be deleted.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I think a statement by Jimbo, if he agrees, that it is up to the
deletionists to improve articles (rather than deleting them) will be somewhat
useful for the non-deletionists. I am tired of seeing articles listed for
deletion, simply because somebody thinks it "sucks"; I am tired of being
threatened, "You either improve this article within the week; OR, we are gonna
kill it!"</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>