<DIV>I stronly object to that information as junk. It is extremely useful, and deserves to be in the Wikipedia, just as much as information about any other location in the world.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>RickK, the one that's being attacked as a deletionist<BR><BR><B><I>Fred Bauder <fredbaud@ctelco.net></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR><BR>Let's do remember, though, that mass-importing raises a lot of<BR>additional issues that are relevant here.<BR><BR>One of the checks and balances against triviality is "can it be<BR>confirmed?" Another important one is "has anyone bothered to write<BR>about it?" Mass-imports defeat this latter check, and so are subject<BR>to a higher degree of scrutiny than hand-edited entries.<BR><BR>--Jimbo<BR><BR>That is the essence of what is wrong with the Rambot census junk<BR><BR>Fred<BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>WikiEN-l mailing list<BR>WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org<BR>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l</BLOCKQUOTE><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree">Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard</a>