<DIV>The refusal to maintain a Talk page was one of the problems which led to the contretemps which eventually caused BuddhaInside to be banned.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>RickK<BR><BR><B><I>Richard Grevers <lists@dramatic.co.nz></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:39:42 -0400, Poor, Edmund W <EDMUND.W.POOR@ABC.COM><BR>gave utterance to the following:<BR><BR>><BR>> I would like to:<BR>> *un-ban RK<BR>> *request that everyone avoid posting on [[talk:RK]]<BR>><BR>Ed, won't the latter action reinforce RK's misguided impression that his <BR>talk page is sacred and for his use only, the thing which seemed to <BR>trigger his flying off the handle?<BR><BR>His acceptance that user talk pages are intended for Wikipedians to leave <BR>each other messages is probably one of the keys to resolving this.<BR><BR>-- <BR>Richard Grevers<BR>Between two evils always pick the one you haven't tried</BLOCKQUOTE><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://shopping.yahoo.com/?__yltc=s%3A150000443%2Cd%3A22708228%2Cslk%3Atext%2Csec%3Amail">The New Yahoo! Shopping</a> - with improved product search