<DIV>Enough. Robert, I've put you in my filter so I don't have to read any more of your rants.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>RickK<BR><BR><B><I>Robert <rkscience100@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Ok, I see how you are all behaving.<BR><BR>Now Martin and Angela are cooperating in vandalizing my<BR>home page, despite my repeated pleas to stop harassing me.<BR>And no one on the Wiki-En list seems to have a problem with<BR>their harassment and vandalism.<BR><BR>So this is how it is going to work: If Wikipedia policy<BR>allows them to vandalize my home page, then it should also<BR>allow me to do the same to theirs.<BR><BR>If it is wrong for me to do this to them, then it is also<BR>wrong for them to do the same to me.<BR><BR>It is your choice what kind of community we have. Martin<BR>and Angela, despite my repeated desperate pleas, have made<BR>it clear what kind of behaviour they find acceptable to do<BR>unto others. And many of you have made it clear that you<BR>don't have a problem with this.<BR><BR>Personally, I find your choices incomprehensible. I think<BR>this way leads to
insanity, and the destruction of any<BR>semblance of Wiki-community.<BR><BR>The only choice is to follow my original proposal: When<BR>someone begs and pleads for a person to stop shoving<BR>harassment onto their home page, then that person should<BR>stop doing so. Your way - i.e. allowing this behaviour -<BR>is simply insane.<BR><BR>But it is up to you. All I know is that I refuse to follow<BR>the current Wikipedia policy, which is to forbid me alone<BR>from changing other people's home pages, but allowing<BR>others to harass me.<BR><BR>Robert (RK)<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://shopping.yahoo.com/?__yltc=s%3A150000443%2Cd%3A22708228%2Cslk%3Atext%2Csec%3Amail">The New Yahoo! Shopping</a> - with improved product search