<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#000000>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff>(this is being REsent in HTML - white on black. I
hope... you like. I like.)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff>This may sound offlandish - but I want to throw support
behind the idea of<BR>spelling proper names in close accord to their actual
names' pronunciation.<BR>The English spelling/pronunciation "Prague" would
redirect to "Praha" - the<BR>actual name of the place. This is not something
that should simply be left<BR>to stand along English lines.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff> The idea of keeping English consistent is valid
-- the proper spelling of<BR>English words means that all who read that word can
interpret it to a<BR>reasonable degree of similarity - albeit in their own
accents. (Dan and I<BR>have been talking at length about this). Proper
English spelling then is<BR>generally important because it provides an anchor
for the word - which is<BR>used by billions around the world. Similar to
Han characters, which can be<BR>read consistenly by peoples who can barely say
hello to each other.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff>Hence this is also a good reason also to name proper
names according to<BR>their proper pronunciation. Proper names have long
undergone a normal<BR>Anglicization when translated to English. Attempts
in different aread have<BR>been made to reform this -- the Hepburn system
given way to the pinyin,<BR>being an example -- We do it here already too: [[The
Chang Jiang]] article<BR>redirects from Yangtze - perhaps in tune with the
proper name of the<BR>Yangtze - I dont know for certain -- but this edit was
done by a<BR>ZhongGuo-pedian, and not an Anglo-pedian - hence deference in
Chinese<BR>matters would naturally goes to the guy/gal who is actually
Chinese. Im not<BR>going to give Erik any lectures about travel in
Deutchland.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff>A part of the reason why the En.Wikipedia has far more
traffic than all of<BR>the other languages combined. (Internet access
issues, WP founded by<BR>English speakers, etc.) is that English itself, being
the world lingua<BR>franca - tends to attract people to it - simply because of
the numbers.<BR>There is no reason why a foreign speaker, even with poor English
skills,<BR>should feel like they are unwelcome - (as long as they can
take<BR>correction - but thats attitude -related) - nor should they need
to<BR>excercise some kind of compartmentalized way of thinking about
their<BR>articles - certainly integrated language tools
-implementation might<BR>someday speed up the process of making more articles
avaliable.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff>In fact - what it looks like to me is that the En
wikipedia will be the<BR>major component in a world language wikipedia - that
allows for all kinds of<BR>cross-textual content. To separate these out by
language makes some sense -<BR>for sake of non-confusion, but I submit that
these other variants represent<BR>rifts between English and these other
languages - and hence the willingness<BR>of people to use them. Perhaps a
WorldPedia where only a few of the major<BR>languages are allowed would fit the
bill to start.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff>Naturally grammatical errors will come up, and this is
just the price to be<BR>paid for being the common tongue. There will
always be a struggle between<BR>the forces of ethnoconvergence and ethnostasis -
both of which see each<BR>other as being 'diverent' and 'destructive' -
according to their different<BR>value systems. The one reveres
multiculturalism, while the other reveres<BR>only its own.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff>All that said, I'd just like to see Prague redirect to
"Praha" -(etc) let<BR>"Prague" be recorded as a depricated way of naming
the capital city of<BR>Czechlosovakia. Proper names, at least we can all
agree - belong to the<BR>denzens of those cities, and not to people
elsewhere. Why depricated?<BR>Because I play go, chat, etc, with people
from Czechlosovakia (for example)<BR>. Not something that was a reality as
little as a decade ago.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT color=#ffffff>WLBUY,<BR>-SteveM.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ffffff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT
color=#ffffff>_______________________________________________<BR>WikiEN-l
mailing list<BR></FONT><A href="mailto:WikiEN-l@wikipedia.org"><FONT
color=#ffffff>WikiEN-l@wikipedia.org</FONT></A><BR><A
href="http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l"><FONT
color=#ffffff>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l</FONT></A></DIV></BODY></HTML>