<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Michael Becker <wikipedia@jumpingjackweb.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<P>I have to agree with this. Something needs to be done.<BR>In addition, I would like a new feature (I'm not asking for much am I?<BR>:). I would like a special shared watchlist. This watchlist would be<BR>used for watching articles that have been vandalized by vandals like<BR>Michael. I have found that he always goes back to the same [type of]<BR>article. Basically, there would be an option (for sys op's only) to add<BR>a page to vandal hotlist (or something). </P>
<P>--------------</P>
<P>And why would that be for sysops only ? Why would not regular users feeling that a page has been vandalized by a known vandal be trusted ? What of the "trust by default" wikipedia concept ?</P>
<P>I guess that *that* page would be under enough scrutiny not for it to be protected.</P>
<P>I fear you consider only sysops are doing cleaning work. This is not true, and is a dangerous idea. Everyone is welcome to do clean up. Sysops just have additional tools to clean better and quicker.</P>
<P>Keep up with the good work anyway</P></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
Free <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/tag/*http://calendar.yahoo.com">online calendar</a> with sync to Outlook(TM).