<DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Ray Saintonge <saintonge@telus.net></I></B> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE>>One example is the page<BR>>[[Anthony_Hancock_Paintings_and_Sculptures:_A_Retrospective_Exhibition]]<BR>>.<BR>>NB Anthony Hancock is a character in the film The Rebel played by,<BR>>perhaps confusingly, Tony Hancock. Knowing that Anthony Hancock is/was<BR>>not a real person makes it easier to understand why this article is<BR>>rubbish.<BR>><BR>Tony Hancock WAS a real person!!! His radio comedy ranks right up there <BR>with "The Goon Show" and "Monty Python". Whether the "The Rebel" or the <BR>retrospective are accurate representations of Hancock, or parodies is <BR>quite another question. When absurdists think outside the box they also <BR>abandon the safety of keeping the box in view.</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<P>No, Pete said <EM>Anthony</EM> Hancock wasn't real and <EM>Tony</EM> Hancock was the actor who portrayed him.</P>
<P>—LittleDan</P></DIV><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
Free <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/tag/*http://calendar.yahoo.com">online calendar</a> with sync to Outlook(TM).