<html>
<body>
Just a little note.<br><br>
In the interest of fairness I wanted to state that it may not be strictly
true that no one objects to the ban on User:Viking. I believe User:Triton
may. The following is from Triton on my Talk page (now archived at User
Talk:Dante Alighieri/clovis et al.):<br><br>
<i>Take a look now at the new way of humiliating a user. A new file has
been made called
<a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Viking/ban">User
talk:Viking/ban</a> that will keep showing up on the Recent Changes list
as many times as their attacker(s) wish. When someone not involved sees
that, what is the impression of UserViking?<br><br>
</i>Now, I don't know for CERTAIN that this means Triton objects to the
ban, but I certainly would want to give Triton the chance to clarify
himself. I wouldn't want his comments to go unheard and risk us banning
Viking without giving anyone who cares to defend him a chance to do
so.<i> <br><br>
</i>Let's not ban Viking until we give Triton a clear chance to voice
himself. I would hate for Triton to go unheard.<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
-----<br><br>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
Karim Moussally<br>
kmoussally@cal.berkeley.edu<br><br>
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from
mediocre minds. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not
thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and
courageously uses his intelligence."<br>
-Albert Einstein, <i>attributed<br><br>
</i></body>
</html>