<DIV>I know, I was just presenting my guess of what his misconseption was.<BR><BR><B><I>Brion Vibber <brion@pobox.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 18:15, Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:<BR>> Adam probably thinks that an encyclopedia should have<BR>> facts laid out as such, not just vague guesses. It's<BR>> understandable (although I don't agree with it) to<BR>> present speculation as fact to mask uncertainty.<BR>> Certainly other websites do it.<BR><BR>That is the exact opposite of acceptable. An encyclopedia must not<BR>present speculation as fact, as that would be a falsehood.<BR><BR>It may present the fact that there _is_ speculation. That's not the same<BR>thing.<BR><BR>-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)<BR>> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature name=signature.asc </BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/search/mailsig/*http://search.yahoo.com">The New Yahoo! Search</a> - Faster. Easier. Bingo.