<DIV>I don't think there's anything wrong with album listings on wikipedia. They could be useful, and they are information, even if an encyclopedia wouldn't print it.<BR><BR><B><I>Tucci <tucci528@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">PS: I've been wholesale reverting everything he does,<BR>as has many other people. Does anyone have a problem<BR>with me outright deleting articles that have nothing<BR>to revert to? These are almost entirely minor<BR>punkish-emo bands and the track listings for their<BR>albums (presumably, I don't check whether or not he's<BR>correct anymore) and I just delete them if there is<BR>nothing to revert to.<BR><BR>PPS: On my user page, you will find a link to<BR>[[TUF-KAT/Pseudo-album stubs]]. Please add a link to<BR>any article on an album that does not have:<BR>*A track listing<BR>*Album cover<BR>*Complete personnel/Billboard chart positions<BR>*At least a sentence or three about how it fits in the<BR>band/genre's oeuvre (sp?)<BR><BR>Including the above will make these articles<BR>worthwhile stubs, while "XXX is an album by ZZZ" with<BR>a track listing helps no one.</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p><br><hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/search/mailsig/*http://search.yahoo.com">The New Yahoo! Search</a> - Faster. Easier. Bingo.