<DIV>Not to mention that at least one of those pictures, and probably more than one, is a copyright violation. It comes from the yahoo pictures site, is copyrighted by Reuters, and the page it comes from specifically says that it MAY NOT be reproduced. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Zoe</DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>james duffy <jtdirl@hotmail.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR><BR><BR>OK. That is it. I've definitely come across the most revolting thing on <BR>wikipedia. An anonymous user how now decided to use the name of a recent <BR>dead person, Rachel Corrie. It is stomach churning to think that anyone <BR>could be so tactless as to use a dead person's name and spread it all across <BR>the wiki doing edits, etc. We didn't say say you cannot choose a recently <BR>dead person's name because no-one could have imagined that anyone would be <BR>so sick as to do it. Obviously there are sickos out there who stoop to this <BR>repulsive level.<BR><BR>That's before you get into the contents, which is just YET ANOTHER rachel <BR>corrie shrine, littered with every image that can be found. Some people on <BR>wiki have been sailing very close to the POV wind in their promotion of <BR>image upon image of Rachel, a lof of them totally irrelevant. Just the same <BR>shots repeated in a different pose. Rachel looking to camera in the USA. <BR>Rachel looking to camera in Gaza. Rachel looking to camera again in the US <BR>(but this time with a frown! Obviously we NEED to show her smiling AND <BR>frowning!!! The agendasizing of the main article on her with photographs is <BR>bad enough. Creating a User:RachelCorrie is beyond disgusting. What next? <BR>Supporters of the Iraq War creating a user name under the late British <BR>soldier Ian Malone's name with pro-war images. Supporters of George Bush <BR>creating a username to promote images for the President. Supporters of <BR>Saddam creating a user name in his name to put pro-Saddam images on? This is <BR>getting ridiculous and is making an ass out of wikipedia and showing <BR>monumental disrespect to a recently deceased person. God forbid that any of <BR>Rachel's family should do a google search and find wiki has someone claiming <BR>to be their daughter or sister. What sort of sad sicko would be tactless and <BR>crude enough to do such a thing?<BR><BR>JT<BR><BR><BR>_________________________________________________________________<BR>Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. <BR>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>WikiEN-l mailing list<BR>WikiEN-l@wikipedia.org<BR>http://www.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l</BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/search/mailsig/*http://search.yahoo.com">The New Yahoo! Search</a> - Faster. Easier. Bingo.