<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Zoe: "Although I agree that the subject deserves an article, any article
with this title cannot be NPOV."</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Your statements although brief, contain usually at
least one assumption. 1. That the subject being 'deserving' of an article
is even close to being in question, and that 2. such a thing cannot be NPOV,
simply because its controversial. It is what it is. Turks in the late
90s killed far more Kurds than the Serb "Christians" were killing Croat
Muslims. The US sanctioned, supported, and suppressed it. It further has
relevance because the US reportedly was in the process of selling out the Kurds
to Turkey again, striking a deal to allow Turkey dominion over certain sections
in Northern Iraq that border Turkey.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As for Danny's assertion, which Jim
seconded, that this is no place for notes, I don't see how some structured
notes are any different than an article in formation. There are two ways of
sculpting something: By building up, (like clay) or breaking down (like chipping
a marble). Im speaking as an artist, of course, but the analogy is valid, I
think. Of course, provided work gets done to article-ize the page.
Hence, time, which I did not have in abundance, while I was taking notes. Not
that I dont understand the usual concerns. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>