<P>I strongly agree with this. By allowing nonsense like this to exist in the Wikipedia, it taints the entire project.
<P>Zoe
<P> <B><I>daniwo59@aol.com</I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><FONT face=arial,helvetica><FONT lang=0 face=Arial size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF">In a message dated 1/7/2003 10:01:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, cunctator@kband.com writes:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" TYPE="CITE">On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 21:20, daniwo59@aol.com wrote:<BR>>We now have an extensive and linked list of imaginary countries, including my <BR>>personal favorite, "Purple Bunny" (I kid you not). Another link is to the <BR>>Confederate Online States. Will we have an article for each state in the <BR>>"confederacy" too? I think this is getting a tad excessive. Anyone else think <BR>>so too?<BR>><BR>My question is, so what? Wikipedia is not paper. If you think it's<BR>excessive, then don't contribute to it. <BR><BR>The real problem is that most of the entries are being written in CIA<BR>World Factbook style, not Wikipedia style.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>I would like to think that we are trying to put together a serious encyclopedia. It has nothing to do with whether we are paper or not. </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT><p><br><hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com">Yahoo! Mail Plus</a> - Powerful. Affordable. <a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com">Sign up now</a>