[WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Board statement regarding biographies of l...

[FT2]

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:46 AM, <WJhonson at aol.com> wrote:

> I agree that some *specific* details of how a person was verified could
> remain private.  It is rather the method, scope, and result that should be
> made public so many eyes can self-validate that it's a method that is not
> trivial to fool.
>
> Will
>


Good point, and sensible. On that note, I think we now agree more generally.

FT2