2009/4/16 Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net>et>:
In fact, this is almost the same as the BLP and
privacy abuses. Sanger is a
particular named individual that Wikipedia is making claims about. He says
the claims are wrong. It's up to us to get them right, whether it "improves
the encyclopedia" or not--and if getting them right doesn't improve the
encyclopedia, what are we doing making *any* claims about *anyone's*
founder status?
Oh, I'd agree. But (a) we won't settle the truth of the matter in yet
another discussion here, and (b) Sanger didn't post to the list to
improve Wikipedia; he posted here to bitch about Wikipedia and Jimbo
Wales, not necessarily in that order.