On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:39 PM, doc <doc.wikipedia(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
phoebe ayers wrote:
I am all in favor of seeing if we can change
people's behavior in
subtle ways; it will take many solutions all working together to fix
blp's.
-- phoebe
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
A very simple and non-controversial start might be to ask New Page
patrolers, when they see a new unsourced BLP (or indeed any unsourced
article) to put a polite message on the creator's talk page saying
"Thanks for your article [XYZ]. Wikipedia asks that all material be
verifiable from reliable sources, it is important that readers and other
users can check what's been writen. You don't seem to have told us the
source you used for this article. Please can you edit the article to
indicate what the source is? (Click here for help if you don't know
how.) Unsourced material about living people may be removed if challenged."
That doesn't bite or threaten any newbies, although if established
editors keep getting these on their talk pages, threats might be warranted.
Yes, definitely -- I try to do this whenever I dabble in new page
patrolling, and it depresses me to no end that everyone doesn't do
this. It's common politeness. The majority of new articles aren't
suitable for wp, but they aren't spam or pure vandalism either -- and
we need to do a much better job of interacting with these potential
good contributors.
For a template, I think you're looking for something like
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Welcomeunsourced, only less
wordy and not only for reverted edits.
p.s. per my previous msg, I guess I'm showing my age -- I think I was
thinking of the new page template proposal from 2005:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_article_template
-- phoebe