In a message dated 9/17/2008 6:28:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com writes:
However the court did discuss what might have
been necessary to constitute reproduction of a substantial part, and
taking plotlines and so forth probably would have amounted to
reproduction.>>
-------------------
The way you've worded this, does not make it clear whether you are stating
that:
A) "The court discussed it... and in THEIR discussion mentioned 'taking
plotlines'"
or
B) "The court discussed it.. and it's my opinion that 'taking
plotlines'....
Can you clarify and if possible cite to the opinion discussion details
**************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog,
plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at
StyleList.com.
(
http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)