Anthony wrote:
Why would someone be *glad* that it's not obvious
who wrote an article?
What rational reason could there possibly be for such a position? I'll
grant that in some situations it might be rational to give away your work
for free and without attribution, but to be *glad* specifically *because*
you are not attributed, I don't see how that can possibly be considered a
moral position within the framework of Objectivism.
Me, I wasn't claiming any moral position within the framework
of Objectivism. It's more like a [[Random act of kindness]].
(But yes, part of the silly, delicious little thrill is precisely
that the recipient will never know who his benefactor is.
Whether this is rational or not I won't say.)