(I know we're rather off-topic here, but I really would like to
understand this.)
2008/11/4 Charlotte Webb <charlottethewebb(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 11/4/08, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It's a piece of code on a server, what's
not to trust? I presume it's
not the actual software you distrust, so what is it?
The operator, surely.
Who do you mean by the operator? The people changing whether the
flagged or latest version is shown by default? The people doing the
flagging? They'll be guided by policy just as in everything else and
that policy can be made strictly more open than the current protection
policy, so what's the problem?