On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Actually, having just re-read White Cat's 3rd email to this thread, it
seems the deleted redirect WAS of the form [[Wikipedia:Requests for
arbitration/XXX]]. So what makes you think anyone has a problem with
WP:RFAR/ redirects?
That was one problem. The other problem was that White Cat's
suggestion that the case "Cool Cat, Davenbelle and Stereotek" be
renamed to "Davenbelle" was rejected, mainly because there were
several remedies in the case specifically referring to him, and now he
wants to create a redirect of the form "Davenbelle". You can see how
one comes to the conclusion that he's trying to run around that
decision not to rename the case.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com