On 21/03/2008, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I want to do that later on. Lets start general and
then go to specifics. Is
everyone in this thread satisfied with how arbcom runs? How much experience
did you have with them?
That's not how it works. You start with specifics and then generalise.
Trying to do it backwards doesn't work (what's the point in discussing
specific cases once you've already established the general case?). You
wish a particular action to take place (disbanding arbcom), so the
burden of proof is on you. Present your evidence.