[WikiEN-l] Scary...
Todd Allen
toddmallen at gmail.com
Wed Mar 12 23:32:25 UTC 2008
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:04 AM, David Goodman <dgoodmanny at gmail.com> wrote:
> Examine Tony's statement earlier in the thread:
>
> "I agree 100% If I can't convince anybody that something belongs in
> Wikipedia, it doesn't belong in Wikipedia."
> He doesnt say "convince everybody" Read literally, if any unbiased
> editor will support something, it should stay in, just as we don't ban
> a user if any one administrator is willing to unblock him.
>
> More practically, it would require the consent of the community to
> remove material. The only other way of reading it, is that it means,
> convince everybody--but there wont be any content at all left on
> controversial subjects if we do that. So I suppose he means
> consensus. I agree with him that the removal of good-faith material
> should require prior consensus.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Charlotte Webb
> <charlottethewebb at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/10/08, Tony Sidaway <tonysidaway at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I agree 100% If I can't convince anybody that something belongs in
> > > Wikipedia, it doesn't belong in Wikipedia.
> >
> > Depends on your definition of "anybody" in this context. Hopefully you
> > can recognize the (subtle) ambiguity here, but I can explain it if
> > necessary (and if I can find the words to concisely do so, which might
> > not be so easy).
> >
> > —C.W.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >
>
>
>
> --
> David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
You are correct if, and only if, it is sourced. Our core policies
already have clear consensus that -unsourced- information may be
removed by anyone at any time, and that such information may not be
put back until and unless a credible source is located.
--
Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list