If everyone of the 10,000 or so active editors commented on one afd a
week on a topic they were not personally involved in (in addition of
course to whatever hey were) we'd have about 10 neutral comments on
each proposal, which would give a much clearer view of true consensus.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:34 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 09/03/2008, Judson Dunn
<cohesion(a)sleepyhead.org> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:03 AM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Participate. This is like shovelling
through sewage, but the only way
> to get the attitude changed is to get in there. Got a spare half an
> hour today?
I guess that really is the only way, sadly
enough, ha. All our mailing
list agreement won't mean much to the people that work it every day
and don't read this. :) I'll do some work this week I promise. Maybe
this can be the start of a big change in Notability! :D
And remember: it appears most AFD nominators are quite unable to tell
disagreement from a personal attack. See my talk page. So always
include "Not to at all question the nominator's sincerity or good
faith, but ..." when someone's done something so stupid you can hardly
believe it.
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.