On Mar 8, 2008, at 12:22 PM, David Gerard wrote:
On 08/03/2008, Philip Sandifer
<snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
IANAL, so I'm not about to interpret any of
these fascinating
tidbits,
though it does suggest that the straightforward scholarly non-profit
source using another scholarly non-profit source argument might be a
little weaker than it had initially seemed, given that CAS numbers
seem to be used primarily in industrial settings.
If they're really suing people over using other numberings, then I,
and I suspect many others, shall just have acquired a new hobby. The
Scientologists have lost anyway.
Oh, if they're doing that, fuck 'em.
-Phil