On 07/03/2008, Kurt Maxwell Weber <kmw(a)armory.com> wrote:
On Thursday 06 March 2008 16:24, Steve Bennett wrote:
Do we want an article on every distant object, no
matter how little is
known on it?
Yes. If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.
No if a reasonable amount has be written about it then is may be the
subject of an article?
I don't think we want an article on every
single arrowhead, pottery
fragment or piece of flint.
We do. If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.
No if someone has written a reasonable amount about it then maybe otherwise no.
*"31 million CAS registry numbers have been allocated for chemical
compounds."
We could do with some lists, but an article on every compound is
probably too much, when so little can be said for so many of them.
No, it's not. If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.
How much do you know about modern organic synthesis?
--
geni