On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Kurt Maxwell Weber <kmw(a)armory.com> wrote:
On Thursday 06 March 2008 16:24, Steve Bennett wrote:
Do we want an article on every distant object, no
matter how little is
known on it?
Yes. If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.
I don't think we want an article on every
single arrowhead, pottery
fragment or piece of flint.
We do. If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.
*"31 million CAS registry numbers have been allocated for chemical
compounds."
We could do with some lists, but an article on every compound is
probably too much, when so little can be said for so many of them.
No, it's not. If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.
This is quite an extremist opinion, with which many people would have
huge problems.
I exist. But I'm not a legitimate subject for an article.
--Oskar