On 05/03/2008, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
vicious attack in a blog written by the classic
"disgruntled former
employee" who also failed to be elected to the Board?
To be fair: places 3-6 in the election were a photo-finish. Danny
didn't so much lose as not quite win.
substantiated by at least a tiny little bit of
evidence. I mean, seriously -
if that aide to Bush who was dismissed for fabricating dozens of newspaper
columns then came back and said, with no evidence, "Bush charged the Fed for
expensive wine and prostitutes while in Moscow!" would anyone, even his most
ardent opponents, believe him? No. The same should be true here.
I think that's not really an apposite comparison. Danny quit because
he was angry and upset at how WMF was being run, not fired for
malfeasance.
- d.