On 04/03/2008, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:40 PM, cohesion
<cohesion(a)sleepyhead.org> wrote:
I personally don't think this extreme
reading of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NFCC#10c is such a great idea,
but it's been around for a while now.
Likewise. That page doesn't even make a link compulsory; all that's
compulsory is the name of the article.
Even that requirement is relatively new.
Um January 2006 is relatively new? Image was uploaded after that date.
--
geni