On 04/03/2008, Ray Saintonge
<saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Album or book covers are likely categories where
we would have large
numbers of images. Does it not seem strange that given the number of
album coves illustrated on the net there is a complete absence of cases
about album covers from an industry that is so famously litigious about
copying its music? Maybe there's an unspoken industry standard
No the reason
is that most of the sites with significant numbers of
album covers on are things like iTunes which music companies are
hardly going to object to (well no more so than normal anyway) or took
down the images rather than take things to court (CDCovers.cc):
http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/3608.cfm It seems as though they were doing
more than just hosting images of
album covers.
Ec