[WikiEN-l] ArbCom Legislation

[WJhonson at aol.com]

The counter-argument might be that our purpose is not to protect our  
readers, especially in the face of our policy which says that this sort of  privacy 
only applies to things not "already widely disseminated."
 
And before you say that approach is immoral, I would say the  
counter-approach can also be seen as immoral.  I certainly do not wish to  be protected from 
the information I'm seeking, and I would see people who want  to do that as 
engaging in censorship neither asked for, wanted, nor  warrented.
 
Jon Voight pleading for Angelina Jolie to reconcile with him, might be  
embarrassing to him, or her, or a general reader.  But it's widely  disseminated 
and we should be in the business of suppressing that information,  acting as 
moral judges for the rest of the world.
 
Will Johnson



**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for 
fuel-efficient used cars.      (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)