On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:45 PM, David Katz <dkatz2001(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You've also, again, completely evaded your
responsibility with Sweet Water Blue. That was an abusive sockpuppet
which you used in content disputes and to enable you to vote twice.
Can you give some sort of explanation for that sock as well as Jayjg's
attempt to cover up its existence by using oversight?
SWB is old news and boring at this point. Water under the bridge, if
you will. It may well be that Sarah did something evil and stupid
then, but she's not the same person today that she was then. I
brought it up only to point out that oversight has made it impossible
to fully investigate past activity related to Sarah. I think we should
drop that.
I chose to ignore the implication that Lar is some kind of WR sock CU.
It's too obviously wrong to be deserving of a comment.