[WikiEN-l] Price we pay from the Deletionists: Y-Combinator looking to fu...

[WJhonson at aol.com]

In a message dated 7/19/2008 11:01:32 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
toddmallen at gmail.com writes:

"Wikipedia minus what quality control it manages to have" does  not
sound like an attractive alternative to me, nor something I would  use
in place of Wikipedia, but right to fork is inherent in all  free
projects.>>


-------------------------
Doesn't sound like a meaningful way to describe it (and I know you're  
quoting, i.e. that its not you stating that).
 
I'd think it would be "Wikipedia minus what quANtity control it manages to  
have".
That is, its Wikipedia without Notability, without Self, without COI, maybe  
without OR as well.
 
Personally I have no idea why we care that Porn stars must be in at least  
six films or whatever it is, before they can have an article.  Why not have  an 
article on every single walk-on character from the television show  Bewitched? 
 Why should we care about stubbiness?  I've never really  understood that, 
but hey, I don't have to agree with every policy and guideline  in order to 
abide by them.
 
Will Johnson



**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for 
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)