-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Katz wrote:
It certainly doesn't appear that SV was given this
information so that she
could block or report the person on whom the CheckUser was run. Instead, it
appears that she was told so she could tip off the person.
Perhaps we should just have a policy where users against whom a checkuser is
run have the right to be informed rather than have a situation where you
only find out if your friends with someone who is the friend of a Checkuser
who leaks info.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Jon <scream(a)datascreamer.com>
wrote:Sections 5 and 6 of the privacy policy permit the release of CU
information to /admins/ for example for blocking and reporting.
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_policy#Policy_on_release_of_dat…
Best,
Jon
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
If this is the case, I don't really see any problem. The fact that
checks are run, thats not confidential.
Best,
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkiCb7cACgkQ6+ro8Pm1AtVJNgCfQuEKnhxvXcYQWM6vIuVnakzr
2H8AoIces4PrpVaaBD5eqFgY5I+3bQyQ
=PK7B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----