2008/7/19 Ian Woollard <ian.woollard(a)gmail.com>om>:
2008/7/19 <WJhonson(a)aol.com>om>:
Of course now you've cited a table.
It's still OR; he's taken the original japanese, the table and
synthesised a new spelling.
The only way to prove it's not OR is if he cites a reliable source
that did it before.
Just out of curiosity: why do you need to cite a reliable source for every
transliteration? This is a one-to-one transformation without interpretation,
isn't it?
Michel Vuijlsteke