On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 WJhonson(a)aol.com wrote:
Ken I don't find your paraphrase of what the
underlying issue is to be
accurately reflective of the argument's so far in-world.
Rather it would seem that there are several differing arguments for the
spelling used currently, and several for the alternate view.
Your chief argument has been "you eed a source to show that it's a
mistake",
an idea which seems to be supported only by you.