On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 WJhonson(a)aol.com wrote:
Ok so he says that the katakana, hiragana, etc.
transliteration is
unambiguous, and all I have to do to counter that is to say, "No, it's actually
ambiguous".
We don't demand sources for how to count to 2 or how to look up Morse code,
simply because someone says "no, I don't believe that" and claims that
saying so makes it into a dispute that needs a source. A dispute is at
minimum a *sincere* disagreement, not simply a way of using a rule to make
people jump through hoops.