On Jan 28, 2008 2:52 AM, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Carl Beckhorn wrote:
Personally, I find it strange to think that any
nonfree content not
under the control of the foundation should appear on meta.
And I find it completely bizarre that there is apparently no place
anywhere within any of the foundation's projects that we can host an
image that's explicitly licensed for our use.
I'm all for free content and all, but this has the unsettling feel of
fundamentalism.
The solution is probably to create an explicitly separate site hosted
on Foundation servers for such material. The alternative is to alter
the terms under which meta operates.
Johnleemk