On 1/24/08, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Here we are again ... And again I find myself saying
that it's not
useful to have articles slathered with names promoting people thought.
It creates inappropriate motivations for contributions (already
spammers submit images to list their companies on the image pages),
and unfair credit. No one wants to see the vanity edit warring that
Spammers are submitting useful images? Woohoo!
Seriously, do you have an example?
Is the question of crediting people in article text not perhaps a
question for the board? Do they have an opinion?
We've talked about some of these before. Where are
they?
Yeah!
Steve