I think we should just invite some journalist to do it.
On Jan 23, 2008 10:56 AM, Nick <heligolandwp(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
It would be nice to have a bot that goes through their
article and our
article on one subject, looking for different sources and references, that
would be something useful for both sites, I think.
Nick
On 23/01/2008, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 23/01/2008, Steven Walling <steven.walling(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I see the post didn't mention the 5,000th
article in question.
Citizendium
> is one of the few big wikis where I haven't poked around and
registered
for
an account (actually, probably the only one).
This makes me wonder if
they
> are living up to their goals. Is it 5,000 GA and/or FA quality
articles,
like they
profess they are going to build better than Wikipedia? Or is
it
5,000 total, with lots of schlock thrown in?
We should go through those 5000 articles, and compare them to the
corresponding Wikipedia articles. (It would be good if we can get an
independent body to do a sample of them too.) We should try and make
sure our articles on subjects covered by Citizendium are at least as
good as theirs - call it friendly rivalry. ;)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
Nick
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nick
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l