On Jan 10, 2008 11:23 AM, Majorly <axel9891(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 10/01/2008, Chris Howie <cdhowie(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
All the better to weed out the edit warriors.
Eugh. AGF please! A four day old editor wouldn't even know the meaning of
edit war, let alone what they were doing. It's not their fault the tool
would be forced upon them.
I didn't mean block off the bat. We'd handle it the same way we handle any
other type of vandalism. Revert and warn. If it keeps happening, block.
Yes it does,
there would not be another tier of user between editors and
Jimbo.
There would be a "tier", those with rollback. It's the same, except they
aren't granted it.
... what?
{{fact}}
How is that approach any different from how we let anons edit most of
our
pages?
This is about rollback, not editing in general. Rollback is a more
powerful
tool than the edit button.
I disagree. Edit lets you do anything. Rollback lets you do one specific
thing.
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers