Be realistic - you can't get anything, be it major or minor, done on enwiki these days
without heated debate. So many voices around that at least one will always raise itself in
complaint.
CM
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:33:02 -0500
From: cdhowie(a)gmail.com
To: wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] So, has the need for consensus in wikipedia been eliminated?
On Jan 10, 2008 10:22 AM, Christiano Moreschi <moreschiwikiman(a)hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:
Depends on how you define consensus, Chris. When
it comes to closing an
AfD I certainly consider 2:1 to be a fairly strong consensus one way or the
other, though of course it's always the respective validity of the arguments
that counts.
CM
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
I certainly do not define consensus as "ongoing heated debate over a
controversial change."
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_________________________________________________________________
Get Hotmail on your mobile, text MSN to 63463!