[WikiEN-l] So, has the need for consensus in wikipedia been eliminated?

Christiano Moreschi moreschiwikiman at hotmail.co.uk
Thu Jan 10 15:22:44 UTC 2008


Depends on how you define consensus, Chris. When it comes to closing an AfD I certainly consider 2:1 to be a fairly strong consensus one way or the other, though of course it's always the respective validity of the arguments that counts.

CM

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.

> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:16:33 -0500
> From: cdhowie at gmail.com
> To: wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] So,	has the need for consensus in wikipedia been eliminated?
> 
> On Jan 10, 2008 10:08 AM, Majorly <axel9891 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 10/01/2008, Ian A Holton <poeloq at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Has it been switched off again?
> >
> > No, and it shouldn't be either.
> >
> 
> I'm not sure how to read this:
> 
> 1. "It should not be, and that is my opinion."
> 
> It should be, and that is my opinion.
> 
> 2. "It should not be, because there is no consensus to switch it off."
> 
> There was no consensus to turn it on either.
> 
> Or did you not mean either of these?  (I'm not being sarcastic/abrasive, I
> really don't know what you're saying.)
> 
> -- 
> Chris Howie
> http://www.chrishowie.com
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

_________________________________________________________________
Who's friends with who and co-starred in what?
http://www.searchgamesbox.com/celebrityseparation.shtml


More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list