On Jan 2, 2008 3:45 PM, Meg Ireland <megireland99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So if Wikipedia doesn't believe it is subject to
copyright, what would
be the objection to using it on templates?
On 03/01/2008, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think that the deletion debate established
that, contrary to the
Band's assertions you're relying on, the actual glyphs are ancient and
not subject to current copyright.
That they may have reinvented them and chosen to use them to identify
themselves doesn't mean that they are in fact original and subject to
copyright.
Wait a sec. The individual glyphs aren't copyrightable, no. Neither are the
letters A, B, C, and D. But if I put together stylized forms of A, B, C, and
D, creating a logo, then it's an original piece of art. Certainly
trademarkable, I'd think.
--
--jpgordon ∇∆∇∆