On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Wily D wrote:
But yes, when an admin performs the correct
action in circumstances
where it might've been preferable they let someone else do it, what
should anyone do about it, beyond say something to the admin in
question?
By this reasoning, we shouldn't make edits by banned users revert-on-sight,
either.
The policy says "you may" revert edits by banned users on sight, not
"you must". Very few editors would do anything if a banned user fixed
a spelling error, for instance.
WilyD