[WikiEN-l] Foundation audit

[Ray Saintonge]

Anthony wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2008 2:20 PM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> It isn't "misleading"
>>     
> Maybe it isn't, but Ant stated pretty confidently that she knows it is
> misleading.
>
> In this case, if the expense was from restricted funds, then I think
> she's right that it was misleading, though less misleading than 2006,
> when this expense was filed under "Other".  I'd certainly ask Mona or
> whoever it is that produced the financial statements why it's filed
> under unrestricted funds.  Maybe she or whoever can explain it, then
> Ant wouldn't have to go saying that the financial statements she voted
> to approve are misleading.  Unless there are other parts she also
> knows to be misleading..
"Misleading" because of the application of hindsight is not on apar with 
wilfully misleading
.
Ec