On 24/04/2008, michael west <michawest(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2008/4/24 Judson Dunn
<cohesion(a)sleepyhead.org>rg>:
Why is it not in en or simple? I think they are the must in these kind or
things especially with something as fundamental (as I can understand) as
this.
What do you mean? It's a proposal for the English Wikipedia and is on
the English Wikipedia...