On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
My idea of a comprehensive review includes at least
some examination of the edits of an editor prior to the implementation of
a
ban. Not everyone agrees. Sometimes efficient review is stifled by a low
signal to noise ratio (cliched as that phrase has become these days). I
think that has happened in this case, but hopefully the Committee if it
chooses to accept the case can cut through the noise and make a
determination.
Nathan
That would be a first. More likely silence for a fortnight followed by a
reminder to follow our core policies and a general amnesty.
RR