and for people to stop insisting the coverage in multiple
international newspapers is not sufficiently noteworthy unless it
extends over a period of years. Or anything else in the way of
requirements that will keep out of wikipedia that which they
personally would rather see excluded.
We had a very good policy from the start. NPOV. It only became
questionable when we started dealing with people who thought it meant
SPOV, Subject's Point of View.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:55 AM, James Farrar <james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2008/4/22 David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>om>:
If we end up with grey and skimpy living bios,
then that's how things
are and we can wait for high-quality sources.
...and for people to not want their own article deleted.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG