Perhaps but collaborative consensus or collaboration in general is
relatively unheard of on the article in question. Feel free to glance at the
talk page(s) if you like. You will see many examples of trolling, personal
attacks, abusive sockpuppetry and other forms of disruption for the past
many years.
Unless this issue is addressed first, it is rather pointless to discuss
anything else.
- White Cat
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:25 AM, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 04/04/2008, White Cat
<wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Wikipedia does not pass judgement on history. We
write about what is
sourced
not what is *right*.
Wikipedia does editorial work to determine a collaborative consensus
for the NPOV based on external research. In a way it is passing
judgement, but no more than its sources accommodate for. There is no
particular reason why both sides of an argument should be represented
equally, NPOV#Undue weight might be an interesting read here.
Peter
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l