I'm heading off on a bit of a tangent here, but if you were a publicist,
webmaster or something, would you hand out free images to someone with a
silly sounding name and a gmail account claiming to be a Wikipedia editor ?
If we're going to ask for free photos, surely we can get people set up with
a Wikipedia or Wikimedia e-mail address so they don't sound like a stalking
psychopath.
On 27/09/2007, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/27/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I wrote:
People who want to use publicity shots on
Wikipedia to replace
free-content fan-provided shots tend to use this kind of argument,
which is inaccurate.
I think that Richard Schiff photo is a strong argument in favour of
securing all the good publicity shots we can!
Indeed. I missed out the part about 'non-free fair use' above. I'm
all in favor of people providing their official publicity shots under
a free license!
-Matt
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
Nick
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nick